Over time, GOLDUCK DAO will transition the proposal and voting mechanisms into a hybrid governance model OR full, on-chain platform in a form determined by the community. The DAO can do this by:
Hiring DAO members to take care of administrative, project management, and moderation tasks to replace the company appointed
Creating a community-steering committee
Implementing on-chain voting
Voting annually to elect members for the DAO’s Board (the initial Board is in place for 1 year)
GOLDUCK DAO BOARD Members will be working on building a custom governance module for Phase 2. The objective is to enhance the power of GOLDUCK token holders, and support GOLDUCK Ecosystem future products and functionality.
Upgradable (probably relying on proxy contract, and proxy patterns)
Onchain proposal and voting
Control GOLDUCK DAO governance parameters (vote weight strategy, proposal threshold, voting threshold, vote duration)
Control future GOLDUCK DAO product parameters (fees, thresholds, etc.)
Can be easily modified and utilized by other DAOs
Nice to Have
Delegate-to-many (instead of delegate-to-one)
Can vote without delegating
Delegate for X number of blocks (time lock)
Separate delegation for proposal and voting
To be Considered
No multi-sig backup or override
GOLDUCK Soulbound Token (GSBT) reputation-power focused on Metis platform
Creating 3 DACs under Metis Platform . Each DAC will be under GolduckDAO.
Each DAC dealing in a specific product or use case.
When DACs created, GolduckDAO will be a group of companies
A typical hybrid governance with a trusted multisig might looks like:
ERC20 based voting happens on a project like Snapshot